'A pen warmed up in hell' | Reality-based commentary about Phoenix, Arizona, and the nation.
2The funniest story in the stack is an item reporting that Glendale did not even recoup what it spent as host "city" for the Super Bowl. For years ahead of the spectacle, Phoenix media reported what an economic boon it would be. This is a classic example about how critical thinking is neither taught nor valued in today’s newsrooms (gee, why do we keep losing readers?).
A basic analysis of the hype would have shown that the promised economic benefits would be modest. It happened during high season, so resorts and hotels would already be booked. Indeed, considering the NFL demands blocks of rooms at a discount, the hotel industry probably made less money than it would have otherwise. Sales of souvenirs? Most of the profit goes back to the NFL. Restaurants would have similarly been packed anyway. And so on.
It’s not that the Super Bowl doesn’t bring benefits, in terms of exposure and the gathering of big deal makers. Too bad it took place in an amorphous place without an identity and a stadium in a cotton field on the metro fringe, in a place with little economy besides the great — now shuttered — housing factory. But the media shouldn’t have bought into the economic hype. Alas, the pressure is always extreme to "say something positive." Unfortunately, many reporters today would never even have applied the basic bullshit detector that was once a standard-issue item in their craft.
Read on for more of the Stack.
5
No CommentsIn a previous post, I discussed economic reforms that should be made in the sick, corrupt financial markets. But this is only the start of efforts the next president and Congress must make to prevent a startling decline that is already evident in America. Whatever the Dow shows, most Americans are suffering and for the first time in generations, young people wonder, with good cause, if they can live better lives than their parents.
Real change is needed, and the question is whether the American people and their elected representatives have the guts to face the truth and move ahead. The laughable gas-tax holiday and much wishful thinking about alternative energy and hydrogen cars represent the school of destructive denial. This is "sustainability" that seeks to sustain the current unsustainable economic and social arrangements. It can’t be done.
Yet much of the current mess was caused, not by inexorable laws of economics, but by policy changes to benefit the rich and transnational corporations, as well as a sprawl economy at the root of the current recession. We can change it.
2How can we explain the latest Wall Street Journal/MSNBC poll that shows only 27 percent of respondents have a positive view of the Republican Party yet the Democratic presidential contenders are, at best, tied with President-elect McCain? Is it the inanity of the corporate media? Is it is ignorance of the American voter, who has been brainwashed to believe the right-wing tool McCain is a "maverick"? The next several months will tell.
It’s surely not a good sign that the nation sits paralyzed before multiple crises while people distract themselves with an evil pervert in Austria and some celebutard girl posing semi-nude in Vanity Fair. The corporate media would not cover this stuff if Americans didn’t tune in, in huge, denial-soaked, distraction-addicted numbers.
Obama must show he is "an average guy" — how’d that work out for us with W? We need a president who is average with Washington, Lincoln and FDR — our crises are that dire. And Jeremiah Wright — must keep that front-and-center. Did Obama do enough? Was he too late? Is he damaged? Has the cow jumped over the moon?
Nor is it a good sign that the "gas tax holiday" of President-elect McCain and Sen. Clinton (perhaps running as his vice president?) has not been laughed off stage. How many ways is this a ridiculous idea? And Yet Obama is the "elitist…out of touch with average Americans" who is the party pooper by refusing to endorse it.
No CommentsBarack Obama partisans must be wishing the Rev. Jeremiah Wright had chosen to lay low, so maybe the "preacher issue" would go away, so maybe Obama wouldn’t have to deal with white anxiety over an angry black man. But Wright will not go quietly. He is defending himself and making his case, most recently before the National Press Club. If you don’t watch the entire speech on C-SPAN or a video replay, we don’t have much to talk about.
Wright is as formidable an intellect as he is a "controversial" preacher. He is a preacher of the Gospel, coming from the prophetic tradition…his name is Jeremiah, for goodness sake. If the Gospel doesn’t sometimes make you uncomfortable, you haven’t really read it. If the election is decided on a sound byte of "God damn America" vs. the nuanced and complex message this Jeremiah delivers, then…
Or, as Obama put it in his magisterial address, we could say "not this time." Unfortunately, I increasingly fear that won’t happen. Old habits die hard. Old prejudices. So we will march forward to the McCain presidency. If so, then let Jeremiah say all the things that make the comfortable feel uncomfortable — so it is in the Bible.
It doesn’t matter now. God’s will be done. That’s what Christians pray every Sunday in church, "the most segregated hour in America," many without even realizing what they’re affirming.
Does this Jeremiah have anything to teach us?
2President-elect McCain, his worshipful media coterie in tow, visited New Orleans and declared that the response to Hurricane Katrina had been "disgraceful and terrible," and, according to the doting New York Times, "pledged it would never happen again." The corporate media seemed especially relieved that the "senator from Arizona" had distanced himself from the toxic Texan currently residing in the McCain’s next mansion.
Yet the federal response to Katrina was the natural outgrowth of "conservatism" as it has come to be practiced by the mainstream of the party of Lincoln. The calamity was not an aberration. It was pretty much what would be expected from the combination of ideology, policy and practice from today’s "conservatives."
Maybe the "senator from Arizona" will redefine conservatism. The media desperately want him to be Barry Goldwater (I hear from excellent sources that the elderly Barry, a real senator from Arizona, was dismissive of the carpetbagger McCain). But even Goldwater never ran the government, never contended with the issues facing a 21st century, continental, diverse empire/nation. My experience is that McCain is not much of a hard-core ideologue, except for being a tightwad, a naysayer and, oddly for a combat veteran, trigger happy with the armed forces and eager for foreign adventures.
So what will McCain Conservatism be?
No CommentsSmoke-filled rooms have a bad reputation. Yes, they gave us Warren Harding, but they also gave us Harry Truman. The only way out now for Democrats is to light up the cigars, close the door and force a Kennedy-Johnson ticket.
The question becomes, who gets to be Kennedy? Surely Barack Obama, who has inspired so many, including, poignantly, JFK’s daughter Caroline, with the similarity. And Hillary, with her sharp elbows, my-way-or-the-highway style and even ham-handed speaking, resembles LBJ. Maybe she even has some of the better angels of his nature, although we would pray she didn’t reach the Oval Office through the same tragic circumstances.
But ah, my foes and oh, my friends, that won’t work. Obama must play the role of the outsized senator from Texas.
No Comments
1Peggy Noonan, always a formidable writer and sometimes a formidable thinker, makes this point about a Barack Obama weakness:
His youth, his relative untriedness, the fact that he has not suffered,
been seasoned, been beat about the head by life and left struggling
back, as happens to most adults by a certain time. This is what I hear
from older people, who vote in great numbers. They are not hostile to
his race, they are skeptical of his inexperience.
I’m not sure I buy the second part. Many white Americans won’t vote for a black man. It’s that simple. Her first point is well-made, and frankly is a problem for most at the top echelons of American society now that meritocracy is dead. A Harry Truman couldn’t become president now. And the days are largely gone when a son of the elite, such as Jack Kennedy, served in combat alongside his fellow citizens of all walks.
Which brings us to John McCain. Noonan says slyly he should promise to be a one-term president. "For many in the middle it would be a twofer," she writes. "You get a good man, for
only four years, and Mr. Obama gets to grow and deepen. He’ll be better
older." This is her partisan side clouding judgment. McCain is seasoned and has suffered. But to what end? To promise a continuation of the disastrous policies of his callow successor, and the general ideological tilt by the elite untested theorists on the right? To burnish a temper that is legendary and unsettling? I’ve been beaten around the head by life enough to be not merely skeptical, but scared of this man.
There’s more in the stack. Read on.
1ABC deserves every hit it has taken for the "debate" that focused on swift-boating Barack Obama, including a question fed to former Clinton intimate George Stephanopoulos by right-wing thug Sean Hannity. A couple of other points deserve our attention — indeed, they are the real story.
First, most television "news" stopped being journalism years ago. This has been aggravated by the elimination of the fairness doctrine and deregulation that allowed consolidation in the media. Now the owners of the public airwaves have no requirement to support the public trust by providing balanced news. They have a powerful interest in supporting the corporate tilt of Washington, which even manifests itself in Charlie Gibson’s flat-wrong assertions about the capital gains tax. Talk about elitists. The corporate electronic media are part of the elite (Charlie wants his tax breaks and completely understands man-of-the-people McCain with his eight houses and millions).
With silliness such as the taped "questions" by "average" uninformed (God help us) voters, such as the poor woman who asked about the flag pin, it’s obvious this elite has an agenda. They have chosen sides. Note McCain never gets questioned about his genuinely questionable ties. They want us stupid. The public schools have been destroyed. Even the conservative Economist says meritocracy is dead in America. Endless hours of television and cheap electronic distractions add to the mindness suckling at the Matrix. Just to be sure, we have "debates" such as the one in Philadelphia.
What on earth might we realize if we didn’t have our minds on flag pins and Obama’s pastor?
2I hope you noticed the different receptions given to John McCain and Barack Obama at the Associated Press earlier this week. The supposed liberal, Obama-loving media offered McCain a love-fest, complete with his favorite donut with sprinkles and no follow-ups to some of his bizarre or controversial answers to questions. When Obama appeared, AP director Billy Dean Singleton, who has destroyed some of America’s best newspapers, asked the Illinois senator if he would favor shifting troops to Afghanistan to fight "Obama bin Laden." I am not making this up.
One of the biggest challenges to Democrats this year is that the mainstream media simply won’t report fairly on McCain, much less go after him the way it did when Obama made the "bitter" comment. Combined with Democrat self-destruction, the ignorance of much of the electorate, and the way Republicans steal close elections, I think McCain has a very good chance of winning the White House.
So based on McCain’s record in Arizona, his policy statements and temperment, let’s imagine the next four years.
2We start out with news of Delta Air Lines and Northwest intensifying their merger talks. We won’t hear how the mergers of the past have only worsened the mess at the airlines. Why? They take away competition, leave the remaining carriers in a group-think mode that discourages innovations (hello, newspaper industry), and are paid for partly by laying off the experienced employees and cutting the service that make for a great airline.
The combined carrier will be two drunks holding each other up — most mergers fail to deliver their promised "benefits." If either carrier is too weak to stand, let it liquidate (it wouldn’t) and make room for new competition, Doing the same disastrous thing over and over while expecting a different outcome is a definition of insanity. Ah, but every time the crazy top execs and investment bankers get richer. Meanwhile, we do nothing to improve our transportation system, such as building high-speed rail.
There’s also a stack of Arizona funnies..
No Comments
6Thousands of flights have been canceled for safety reasons, and as usual the corporate media are missing the larger issues.
One is that that FAA was so cozy with the airline industry that warnings from inspectors were being dismissed. This is a lethal echo of what happened in the economy, where lax regulation was the biggest cause of the subprime mortgage meltdown and wider credit crisis. The IMF calls it the worst shock to the world economy since the Great Depression. Not only did regulators look the other way, they enabled the crisis by pumping up a credit bubble. Regulators were told what to do by the industry.
The most radical reading of Milton Friedman and other conservative economists would say a company has no other responsibility than to make money for its shareholders. Everything else, to the extent that it is a good at all, will be taken care of by the market. There is no public good — that is a socialist construct. Presumably this means when poorly maintained airliners start dropping out of the sky, the surviving customers will chose other carriers.
In the real world, capitalism works for all when it is balanced by effective regulation, especially to ensure safety, competition, lawfulness and to prevent the formation of monopolies and cartels. It also thrives because of public works, projects that the market itself can’t achieve but nevertheless enhance productivity and quality of life.
Another shadow issue is how these airlines have spent years cutting staff and outsourcing maintenance, pushing out their most experienced — and most "expensive" — employees. Salaries for pilots (they’re not important, right?) and other workers have been slashed. Unions have been busted. The savings have gone to huge compensation for senior executives, and to a plutocracy on Wall Street. Even average shareholders have not benefited.
But the biggest problem — the one we dare not even talk about — is how the crisis at the airlines shows that the American transportation system is outmoded and broken. No presidential candidate is even mentioning this.
No Comments