Arizona, in a hole, calls for more shovels

It's difficult to get news out of Arizona since the state's largest newspaper became "The Information Center," pushed out many of its most experienced and talented journalists and put up a minimalist Web site that's little more informative than somebody's personal Blogspot page. But is it really true that Joe Arpaio and Andrew Peyton Thomas were re-elected? That voters approved a ban on any property-transfer taxes? That they outlawed gay marriage? That Arizona turnout was lower than the state's usually low number — and during an election that saw a historic high of turnout back in the United States?

Apparently so. The Joe/Peyton coronation ensures that the public focus will remain on persecuting the poor and minorities, some of whom happen to be illegal aliens that allow the low-wage construction and tourism economy to thrive. Heaven forbid that the state pay attention to providing ladders up in the New Economy and avoid adding to the dangerous income inequality, linear slums and underclass already growing like kudzu there.

Gay marriage — such a vital issue at a time of, oh, dwindling water supplies, awful schools, an economy in freefall and the state's vulnerability to global warming. One might ask, when will the tourism economy feel the brunt of a boycott by "the homosexuals" who also tend to have higher disposable income. California enacted a ban, too — a last gasp of the suburban churchy bigots — but voters there also passed high-speed rail and other progressive measures.

The prohibition on enacting real-estate transfer taxes ("Save Our Homes") will further hamstring government's ability to pay for the public investments desperately needed by this broiling dystopia. It won't save anybody's house, but it will keep the Real Estate Industrial Complex from paying even a modest amount into the commons from which it reaps so much profit. Meanwhile, infrastructure will be hopelessly behind, education remain at a Mississippi level and investments for competitiveness impossible to fund. All you struggling "home owners" with low-wage Arizona jobs and talk-radio-fed grievances — you've been punk'd by the rich elites that run the state and keep you down.

It's amazingly backward looking, inward looking and tribal. Nothing in the election seems to have been attuned to helping Arizona prosper, or even survive, in the 21st century. The decisions by the voting minority don't even seem to take notice of the 21st century. And the sum of intolerance, ignorance and apathy is shocking — even for those of us who have the battle scars from seeing what this once-promising place has become. But this is also what happens when most people don't vote.

Read more booster-busting reality about the state on Rogue's Arizona Crisis page, and past columns.

6 Comments

  1. Italiana

    What a glorious, awful week for this Arizonan. For 2 days I refused to talk about the Arizona debacle just to enjoy Obama’s win. But now I must. I know that Prop 102 in AZ and Prop 8 (especially Prop 8) are over-reach by Mormons, Catholics and Evangelicals. However, after fighting 30 years of this kind of civic abuse, I feel beaten down. Now Napolitano’s playing coy about leaving the people who’ve supported her to suffer at the hands of Jan Brewer (Arizona’s long-in-the-tooth version of Sarah Palin). It’s a sad, sad time in AZ. I’ve said it before; I’ll say it again — you’re fortunate to be gone, Jon

  2. It burns. The exhilaration of this historic election is stolen from me as I review the bitter results of our local polling…
    Perhaps I’ll feel more charitable again soon (oh, I know I will), but right now – what a bunch of losers we are.

  3. Mark

    I am still fighting the political fight in Arizona and couldn’t be more dispirited by state and county election results, with one exception: the corporation commission race. As an exception to your piece, too, two Democrats for sure and possibly a third (not all the votes have been counted yet) won seats, after running on a progressive message of developing Arizona’s solar resources, billing themselves “The Solar Team.” The clear messaging appears to have paid off for this low-ballot but very important position.
    Keep up the great work, Jon.

  4. voice in the wilderness

    Arizona will never change while the same people control the party and insist that the old ways are good enough. They aren’t. But it’s a cosy little box and they seem to think throwing money at bad candidates is better than having the guts to tell people who can’t win, just that. The AZ Democratic party needs new blood, and new ideas. And more than that, it needs new strategies and new candidates. And by that I mean new fresh candidates with charisma and personality, not retreads and stereotypes. Until there is a fundamental change the AZ Democratic Party needs to take Santayana seriously. He was right.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *